Flow Cytometry Apparatus and Methods

ABSTRACT

A particle analyzer, comprising a source of a substantially nondiffracting light beam; a flow path configured to produce in a flowcell a ribbon-like core stream having a specific cross-sectional aspect ratio; the flowcell being configured to expose a segment of the core stream to the light beam; a detector configured to receive a signal resulting from an interaction of a particle in the core stream with the light beam; a first sorting actuator connected with the flowcell, downstream of the exposed segment of core stream; a plurality of sorting channels in fluid connection with the flow path and downstream of the first actuator; the actuator having multiple actuation states, each state configured to direct at least one part of the core stream to a corresponding channel; a second sorting actuator connected with the flowcell, opposite the first actuator, and operable in coordination with the first actuator.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to U.S. provisional patent applicationSer. No. 62/022,662, filed Jul. 10, 2014; and U.S. nonprovisional patentapplication Ser. No. 14/793,626, filed Jul. 7, 2015, both of which areherein incorporated by reference in their entireties.

BACKGROUND

Cellular analysis by flow cytometry has reached a high level of bothsophistication and parallelism, enabling its widespread use in lifescience research and medical diagnostics alike. Yet for all itsremarkable success as a technology, much remains to be done in order tomeet significant needs in terms of applications.

One of the areas where flow cytometry has not yet made significantinroads, but could potentially bring tremendous benefit, is the analysisof very rare events. The diagnostic/prognostic fields of CirculatingTumor Cells (CTCs) and detection of fetal cells in maternal blood arewell-known examples of what could be called ultra-rare-event analysis;here the “interesting” cells make up a minute fraction of the totalcells in the sample. For example; out of the ˜10⁹ cell/mL concentrationof normal cells in blood, CTCs with clinical significance can range from10⁵ to less than 1 cell/mL Additionally, current technology based onsurface-antigen binding (whether magnetically mediated or not) will, bydesign, miss cell populations not defined by surface antigens. Missingrelevant cells is particularly serious in CTC analysis, where falsenegatives can, at best, reduce assay effectiveness, and at worst,contribute to higher patient mortality. Since flow cytometry is notrestricted to surface-antigen recognition, but can additionally identifycells based on intracellular markers (e.g., vimentin or cytokeratin, formesenchymal cells), nucleic-acid content, and even morphology; it couldcome to the rescue; that it has largely not, so far, is an indictment ofits current limitations in terms of volumetric sample delivery andanalytical throughput with regards to rare-event analysis.

If one were able to break through the current technology limitations inflow cytometry and deliver drastically improved volumetric throughput(“extreme throughput”), a number of benefits would result. In theexample of rare-event analysis for CTCs, one could envision executing aprotocol in minutes instead of hours or even days, significantlyreducing the costs of diagnosis and monitoring; more importantly,testing simply not done today would all of a sudden become practical(and affordable) to execute. This innovation would radically simplifyexisting workflow by allowing the rapid, routine analysis of patientspecimens, avoiding the majority of the complex sample preparation stepsinvolved in current practice. Additionally, there would be moretransformational changes involved in applying the proposed approach torare-event analysis than just boosting throughput to extreme levels (initself sufficient motivation). By bringing the analysis rate of flowcytometry up to the level of immunocapture-based technologies for CTCapplications, one would not simply add another analytical modality tothe mix: one would leverage five decades of platform and assaydevelopment. Flow cytometry has shown a remarkable ability to adapt overtime to evolving scientific findings: As new markers emerge, as newcellular identification strategies are identified and developed,flow-based protocols have been quick to incorporate the newpossibilities into the technology and the discipline. The result is astunningly flexible set of tools that can be used to count, identify,analyze, characterize, select, and (by sorting) harvest and purifydesired cells in a mix. Bringing this toolset to bear in the emergingfield of CTC analysis would present tremendous opportunities toresearchers and, ultimately, clinicians in their efforts to understand,control, and fight cancer. Specifically, an extreme throughput analyzerwould allow CTC detection (and ultimately, capture) based on multipleselection criteria, criteria updateable over time, and would do sofaster, more reliably, and with simpler sample preparation than withcurrently available technologies. Ultimately, it is expected that suchan analyzer, by returning more accurate results and providing anearlier, more sensitive detection of the metastatic process, could helpto significantly improve the survival odds of cancer patients.

More broadly, the development of an extreme-throughput flow cytometrytechnology platform relying on familiar, established assay and protocolformats would make the tool attractive not only for researchlaboratories, but also in the context of High-Throughput Screening (HIS)for pharmaceutical development, as well as in clinical environmentsperforming generally routine flow-based tests again, by drasticallyspeeding up performance, by simplifying the sample preparationprocedure, and by delivering improved sensitivity.

SUMMARY

A particle analyzer, comprising: a source of a non-Gaussian,substantially nondiffracting light beam; a flow path configured toproduce a ribbon-like core stream in a flowcell, said core stream havinga cross-sectional aspect ratio of at least 4 and a largestcross-sectional dimension of at least 50 micrometers; said flowcellbeing configured to expose a segment of said core stream to said lightbeam; and a detector configured to detect a signal from said corestream, the signal resulting from an interaction of a particle in saidcore stream with said light beam.

A particle analyzer, comprising: a source of a non-Gaussian,substantially nondiffracting light beam; a flow path configured toproduce a ribbon-like core stream in a flowcell, said core stream havinga cross-sectional aspect ratio of at least 4 and a largestcross-sectional dimension of at least 50 micrometers; said flowcellbeing configured to expose a segment of said core stream to said lightbeam; a detector configured to detect a signal from said core stream,the signal resulting from an interaction of a particle in said corestream with said light beam; a first sorting actuator connected withsaid flowcell and downstream of said segment of said core stream exposedto said light beam; and a plurality of sorting channels in fluidconnection with said flow path and downstream of said first sortingactuator; said first sorting actuator having multiple actuation states,each actuation state configured to direct at least one part of said corestream to a corresponding sorting channel of said plurality of sortingchannels.

A particle analyzer, comprising: a source of a non-Gaussian,substantially nondiffracting light beam; a flow path configured toproduce a ribbon-like core stream in a flowcell, said core stream havinga cross-sectional aspect ratio of at least 4 and a largestcross-sectional dimension of at least 50 micrometers; said flowcellbeing configured to expose a segment of said core stream to said lightbeam; a detector configured to detect a signal from said core stream,the signal resulting from an interaction of a particle in said corestream with said light beam; a first sorting actuator connected withsaid flowcell and downstream of said segment of said core stream exposedto said light beam; and a plurality of sorting channels in fluidconnection with said flow path and downstream of said first sortingactuator; said first sorting actuator having multiple actuation states,each actuation state configured to direct at least one part of said corestream to a corresponding sorting channel of said plurality of sortingchannels; and a second sorting actuator, said second sorting actuatorbeing connected with said flowcell and opposite said first sortingactuator, said second sorting actuator being operable in coordinationwith said first sorting actuator.

A particle analyzer; comprising: a source of a non-Gaussian,substantially nondiffracting light beam; a flow path configured toproduce a ribbon-like core stream in a flowcell, said core stream havinga cross-sectional aspect ratio of at least 4 and a largestcross-sectional dimension of at least 50 micrometers; said flowcellbeing configured to expose a segment of said core stream to said lightbeam; and a detector configured to detect a signal from said corestream, the signal resulting from an interaction of a particle in saidcore stream with said light beam; wherein said light beam is alignedwith the largest cross-sectional dimension of said core stream under anangle of no more than 45 degrees.

A particle analyzer, comprising: a source of a non-Gaussian,substantially nondiffracting light beam; a flow path configured toproduce a ribbon-like core stream in a flowcell, said core stream havinga cross-sectional aspect ratio of at least 4 and a largestcross-sectional dimension of at least 50 micrometers; said flowcellbeing configured to expose a segment of said core stream to said lightbeam; and a detector configured to detect a signal from said corestream, the signal resulting from an interaction of a particle in saidcore stream with said light beam; wherein said light beam is alignedsubstantially along the largest cross-sectional dimension of said corestream.

A particle analyzer, comprising: a source of a non-Gaussian,substantially nondiffracting light beam; a flow path configured toproduce a ribbon-like core stream in a flowcell, said core stream havinga cross-sectional aspect ratio of at least 4 and a largestcross-sectional dimension of at least 50 micrometers; said flowcellbeing configured to expose a segment of said core stream to said lightbeam; and a plurality of detectors, whereby individual detectors in saidplurality of detectors are configured to receive a signal from acorresponding portion of said core stream, said signal resulting from aninteraction of a particle in said corresponding portion of said corestream with said light beam.

A particle analyzer, comprising: a source of a non-Gaussian,substantially nondiffracting light beam; a flow path configured toproduce a ribbon-like core stream in a flowcell, said core stream havinga cross-sectional aspect ratio of at least 4 and a largestcross-sectional dimension of at least 50 micrometers; said flowcellbeing configured to expose a segment of said core stream to said lightbeam; a plurality of detectors; whereby individual detectors in saidplurality of detectors are configured to receive a signal from acorresponding portion of said core stream, said signal resulting from aninteraction of a particle in said corresponding portion of said corestream with said light beam; a first plurality of sorting actuatorsconnected with said flowcell; said first plurality of sorting actuatorsbeing positioned downstream of said segment of said core stream exposedto said light beam; said first plurality of sorting actuators being insubstantial alignment with the largest cross-sectional dimension of saidcore stream; and a plurality of sorting channels in fluid connectionwith said flow path and downstream of said first plurality of sortingactuators; the sorting actuators of said first plurality of sortingactuators having multiple actuation states, each actuation stateconfigured to direct at least one part of said core stream to acorresponding sorting channel of said plurality of sorting channels.

A particle analyzer, comprising: a source of a non-Gaussian,substantially, nondiffracting light beam; a flow path configured toproduce a ribbon-like core stream in a flowcell, said core stream havinga cross-sectional aspect ratio of at least 4 and a largestcross-sectional dimension of at least 50 micrometers; said flowcellbeing configured to expose a segment of said core stream to said lightbeam; a plurality of detectors, whereby individual detectors in saidplurality of detectors are configured to receive a signal from acorresponding portion of said core stream, said signal resulting from aninteraction of a particle in said corresponding portion of said corestream with said light beam; a first plurality of sorting actuatorsconnected with said flowcell, said first plurality of sorting actuatorsbeing positioned downstream of said segment of said core stream exposedto said light beam; said first plurality of sorting actuators being insubstantial alignment with the largest cross-sectional dimension of saidcore stream; a plurality of sorting channels in fluid connection withsaid flow path and downstream of said first plurality of sortingactuators; the sorting actuators of said first plurality of sortingactuators having multiple actuation states, each actuation stateconfigured to direct at least one part of said core stream to acorresponding sorting channel of said plurality of sorting channels; anda second plurality of sorting actuators, said second plurality ofsorting actuators being connected with said flowcell and opposite saidfirst plurality of sorting actuators, actuators in said second pluralityof sorting actuators being operable in coordination with actuators insaid first plurality of sorting actuators.

A particle analyzer, comprising: a source of a non-Gaussian,substantially, nondiffracting light beam; a flow path configured toproduce a ribbon-like core stream in a flowcell, said core stream havinga cross-sectional aspect ratio of at least 4 and a largestcross-sectional dimension of at least 50 micrometers; said flowcellbeing configured to expose a segment of said core stream to said lightbeam; and a plurality of detectors, whereby individual detectors in saidplurality of detectors are configured to receive a signal from acorresponding portion of said core stream, said signal resulting from aninteraction of a particle in said corresponding portion of said corestream with said light beam; wherein said light beam is aligned with thelargest cross-sectional dimension of said core stream under an angle ofno more than 45 degrees.

A particle analyzer; comprising: a source of a non-Gaussian,substantially nondiffracting light beam; a flow path configured toproduce a ribbon-like core stream in a flowcell, said core stream havinga cross-sectional aspect ratio of at least 4 and a largestcross-sectional dimension of at least 50 micrometers; said flowcellbeing configured to expose a segment of said core stream to said lightbeam; and a plurality of detectors, whereby individual detectors in saidplurality of detectors are configured to receive a signal from acorresponding portion of said core stream, said signal resulting from aninteraction of a particle in said corresponding portion of said corestream with said light beam; wherein said light beam is alignedsubstantially along the largest cross-sectional dimension of said corestream.

A particle analyzer; comprising: a source of a light beam; a flow pathconfigured to produce a ribbon-like core stream in a flowcell, said corestream having a cross-sectional aspect ratio of at least 4 and a largestcross-sectional dimension of at least 50 micrometers; said flowcellbeing configured to expose a segment of said core stream to said lightbeam; and a plurality of detectors, whereby individual detectors in saidplurality of detectors are configured to receive a signal from acorresponding portion of said core stream, said signal resulting from aninteraction of a particle in said corresponding portion of said corestream with said light beam.

A particle analyzer, comprising: a source of a light beam; a flow pathconfigured to produce a ribbon-like core stream in a flowcell, said corestream having a cross-sectional aspect ratio of at least 4 and a largestcross-sectional dimension of at least 50 micrometers; said flowcellbeing configured to expose a segment of said core stream to said lightbeam; a plurality of detectors, whereby individual detectors in saidplurality of detectors are configured to receive a signal from acorresponding portion of said core stream, said signal resulting from aninteraction of a particle in said corresponding portion of said corestream with said light beam; a first plurality of sorting actuatorsconnected with said flowcell, said plurality of sorting actuators beingpositioned downstream of said segment of said core stream exposed tosaid light beam; said plurality of sorting actuators being insubstantial alignment with the largest cross-sectional dimension of saidcore stream; and a plurality of sorting channels in fluid connectionwith said flow path and downstream of said first plurality of sortingactuators; the sorting actuators of said first plurality of sortingactuators having multiple actuation states, each actuation stateconfigured to direct at least one part of said core stream to acorresponding sorting channel of said plurality of sorting channels.

A particle analyzer, comprising: a source of a light beam; a flow pathconfigured to produce a ribbon-like core stream in a flowcell, said corestream having a cross-sectional aspect ratio of at least 4 and a largestcross-sectional dimension of at least 50 micrometers; said flowcellbeing configured to expose a segment of said core stream to said lightbeam; a plurality of detectors, whereby individual detectors in saidplurality of detectors are configured to receive a signal from acorresponding portion of said core stream, said signal resulting from aninteraction of a particle in said corresponding portion of said corestream with said light beam; a first plurality of sorting actuatorsconnected with said flowcell, said plurality of sorting actuators beingpositioned downstream of said segment of said core stream exposed tosaid light beam; said plurality of sorting actuators being insubstantial alignment with the largest cross-sectional dimension of saidcore stream; a plurality of sorting channels in fluid connection withsaid flow path and downstream of said first plurality of sortingactuators; the sorting actuators of said first plurality of sortingactuators having multiple actuation states, each actuation stateconfigured to direct at least one part of said core stream to acorresponding sorting channel of said plurality of sorting channels; anda second plurality of sorting actuators, said second plurality ofsorting actuators being connected with said flowcell and opposite saidfirst plurality of sorting actuators, actuators in said second pluralityof sorting actuators being operable in coordination with actuators insaid first plurality of sorting actuators.

A particle analyzer, comprising: a source of a light beam; a flow pathconfigured to produce a ribbon-like core stream in a flowcell, said corestream having a cross-sectional aspect ratio of at least 4 and a largestcross-sectional dimension of at least 50 micrometers; said flowcellbeing configured to expose a segment of said core stream to said lightbeam; and a plurality of detectors, whereby individual detectors in saidplurality of detectors are configured to receive a signal from acorresponding portion of said core stream, said signal resulting from aninteraction of a particle in said corresponding portion of said corestream with said light beam; wherein said light beam is aligned with thelargest cross-sectional dimension of said core stream under an angle ofno more than 45 degrees.

A particle analyzer, comprising: a source of a light beam; a flow pathconfigured to produce a ribbon-like core stream in a flowcell, said corestream having a cross-sectional aspect ratio of at least 4 and a largestcross-sectional dimension of at least 50 micrometers; said flowcellbeing configured to expose a segment of said core stream to said lightbeam; and a plurality of detectors, whereby individual detectors in saidplurality of detectors are configured to receive a signal from acorresponding portion of said core stream, said signal resulting from aninteraction of a particle in said corresponding portion of said corestream with said light beam; wherein said light beam is alignedsubstantially along the largest cross-sectional dimension of said corestream.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic cross-sectional representation of thelight-particle interaction region of a particle analyzer flowcell of theprior art.

FIG. 2 is a schematic cross-sectional representation of thelight-particle interaction region of a particle analyzer/sorter flowcellwith a substantially nondiffracting light beam and an extended corestream.

FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of a reflective Spatial LightModulator used to dynamically modify the phase and/or intensity profileof an incoming light beam and produce a substantially nondiffractingoutgoing beam.

FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of a transmissive Spatial LightModulator used to dynamically modify the phase and/or intensity profileof an incoming light beam and produce a substantially nondiffractingoutgoing beam.

FIG. 5 is a schematic representation of a reflective phase/intensitymask used to modify the phase and/or intensity profile of an incominglight beam in a fixed way and produce a substantially nondiffractingoutgoing beam.

FIG. 6 is a schematic representation of a transmissive phase/intensitymask used to modify the phase and/or intensity profile of an incominglight beam in a fixed way and produce a substantially nondiffractingoutgoing beam.

FIG. 7 is a schematic illustration of a system configuration of anapparatus for high-throughput analysis of single particles in a sample.

FIG. 8 is a schematic illustration of a system configuration of anapparatus for high-throughput analysis and sorting of single particlesin a sample.

FIG. 9 is a schematic representation of the light collection anddetection subsystem of a high-throughput particle analyzer/sorter with asingle spectral detection band.

FIG. 10 is a schematic representation of the light collection anddetection subsystem of a high-throughput particle analyzer/sorter withmultiple spectral detection bands.

FIG. 11 is a schematic representation of the light collection anddetection subsystem of a high-throughput particle analyzer/sorter with aposition-resolving detector array.

FIGS. 12 (a) and (b) are schematic plan-view illustrations of two steps,or states, of a high-throughput particle analysis/sorting method thatuses an actuator array.

FIGS. 13 (a) and (b) are schematic isometric illustrations of two steps,or states, of a high-throughput particle analysis/sorting method thatuses an actuator array.

FIGS. 14 (a) and (b) are schematic cross-sectional illustrations of twosteps, or states, of a high-throughput particle analysis/sorting methodwith two sorting states and one-sided actuation.

FIGS. 15 (a) and (b) are schematic cross-sectional illustrations of twosteps, or states, of a high-throughput particle analysis/sorting methodwith two sorting states and one-sided actuation.

FIGS. 16 (a) and (b) are schematic cross-sectional illustrations of twosteps, or states, of a high-throughput particle analysis/sorting methodwith two sorting states and two-sided actuation.

FIG. 17 is a schematic isometric illustration of one step, or state, ofa high-throughput particle analysis/sorting method that uses an actuatorarray and multiple sorting channels.

FIGS. 18 (a)-(d) are schematic cross-sectional illustrations of fourstates of a high-throughput particle analysis/sorting method with fivesorting states and one-sided actuation that uses multiple sortingchannels.

FIG. 19 is a schematic representation of a data processing system toprovide a high-throughput particle analyzer/sorter.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The invention pertains to the field of analysis of particles in a fluidstream. In some embodiments the particle analyzer is a Flow Cytometer.Specifically, embodiments of the invention are capable of increased flowthroughput rates in particle analysis, in particular in Flow Cytometry.Some embodiments of the invention are capable of sorting of particles,in addition to their analytical capabilities.

Some embodiments of the present invention have the capability to deliverthe desired extreme throughput by boosting a typical flow cytometer'svolumetric analysis rate by a factor of at least 40; in some embodimentsthe increase may be up to a factor of more than 100. In some embodimentsthis is accomplished by eliminating one of the key constraints ofcurrent flow cytometer designs—a narrowly focused core stream, which hastypically limited flow cytometry to volumetric analysis rates of no morethan ˜100 μL/min. By concentrating on rare-event applications, thetypical requirement that cells must flow in single file is relaxed toallow for a much larger core-stream cross-section than normal. Someembodiments of the present invention are capable of analyzing one cellat a time just as in the current art, but the volume of fluid processedper unit time is multiplied dramatically, proportionately reducinganalysis time.

Some embodiments of the invention may include capabilities to: (1)stretching the core stream out by a more than an order of magnitude inthe direction of light propagation; (2) structuring the interrogatinglaser light beam to maintain near-diffraction-free propagation over theentire long dimension of the elongated core stream cross section. Thesecapabilities are schematically illustrated in FIG. 2, in contrast to atypical implementation of flow cytometers of the prior art, shown inFIG. 1.

In order to achieve these capabilities, embodiments of the inventionconstruct a light beam with a focused two-dimensional profile thatpropagates with minimal variation over a propagation length of fromabout 100 μm to 1000 μm or more. Further technical design elements maybe included in embodiments of the invention.

Some embodiments comprise a flowcell geometry with a high aspect ratioto take advantage of hydrodynamic focusing and generate a stretched corestream. Such embodiments may leverage the high aspect ratio of arectangular flowcell cross section to force the sample-bearing corestream, corning out of a standard circular nozzle, into a very thinribbon surrounded by sheath fluid.

Some embodiments incorporate acoustic focusing to further or alternatelycoax the cells in the core stream to align tightly into a thin ribbon.The main shaping of the core stream may be carried out automatically byflowcell design and the properties of hydrodynamic focusing behavior;resonant acoustic focusing may confer to the thin core stream ribbonadditional dynamic stability to ensure robust optical interrogation.Alternately, only acoustic focusing may be employed for the purpose ofgenerating a ribbon-like core stream.

Additionally, embodiments of the invention may comprise design measuresfor the purpose of follow-on analysis of selected cells, and to avoidthe relatively high forces associate with the impact with stationaryliquid in traditional jet-in-air sorting.

Up until now, an assumption has existed that the geometry of a thin,wide core stream ribbon would cause unwanted differences in the lightsignals coming from cells at, say, opposite edges vs. the center of theribbon itself. The following prophetic examples illustrate the expectedbenefits of the performance of the invention in this respect:

For instance, while a ribbon-like core stream is much elongated (in theforward direction of light propagation) as compared to a “pencil-like”core stream, even the extra-wide ribbon anticipated in this exampleconfines the cells in the core stream to a small enough volume to renderpositional differences negligible in terms of forward scattering. Theachieved geometry of a thin, wide core stream ribbon is not likely tocause unwanted differences in the light signals coming from cells at,say, opposite edges vs. the center of the ribbon itself. In particular,this example of an embodiment of the invention may produce a nominal 10°half-cone subtended by the collection pupil in the forward scatteringgeometry, about 30 mm away from the flowcell (typical for many types ofanalyzers). Cells not exactly in the center of the flowcell will giverise to a slightly wider or narrower cone of light collected by thatsame pupil, depending if they are closer or further away from it. Inthis example, based on the ribbon design long dimension of 480 μm, therange of cone half-ang goes from 9.92° to 10.07°. The effect that thisvariation causes on the amplitude of the scattering signal depends onmany variables, such as particle size, composition, and wavelength oflight used; a Mie scattering calculation based on a representativeexample results in Coefficients of Variation (CVs, equal to the standarddeviation of a set of measurements divided by its mean) below 0.2%. Suchvalues are very small compared to other instrumental contributions tomeasurement uncertainty, and essentially undetectable compared tonatural cellular variability. In short, the minute additionaluncertainty introduced will have no discernible effect on almost allapplications.

Another concern that has existed until now refers to the potentialimpact of ribbon streaming on the side scattering and fluorescencesignals. Specifically, from the point of view of fluorescence, theassumption has been that the proposed “extreme” ribbon streaming wouldcause signal variations because of (a) different power density of theexcitation beam at different points in the ribbon, or (b) differentdwell times of the cells in the light beam. These parameters have beenengineered in embodiments of the present invention to overcome thisissue: design choices, in terms of flowcell geometry, fluid injectionrates, and beam profile, have been tailored to optimize performanceaccording to multiple criteria. Specifically, point (a) may be managed,by design, through the use of a phase-structured, substantiallynondiffracting beam, whose property is indeed to maintain a near-uniformcross-section over propagation lengths far longer than those of Gaussianbeams, and sufficient to span the longitudinal width of the ribbon corestream. Point (b) may be managed, again by design, in several ways. Forinstance: first, by ensuring that the flowcell cross-sectional longdimension is sufficiently large to keep the core far enough from theflowcell walls and thus minimize viscous drag on the edges of theribbon; and second, by optionally exploiting the transition region, inthe most upstream section of the flowcell, where the fluid flow has notyet fully developed into a parabolic profile according to Poiseuille'sLaw. Together, these design elements may be used to keep cell velocityvariations in the ribbon core to an acceptable minimum.

Another obstacle that has been raised in discussions of extended corestreams is that of coincident (or doublet) events, namely when more thanone cell is present in the illumination volume at the same time. Thefollowing prophetic example illustrates why this is not likely to be anissue with the present invention:

One can look at exemplary methods of performing assays in the invention,and in particular at dilution ratios of said methods, and estimate theaverage number of cells in the interrogation volume. Using someembodiments of the invention, a sample may be formed by either gentlylysing the erythrocytes in whole blood (thereby effectively diluting theresidual leukocytes with the erythrolytic reagent) or by presenting acell suspension with concentrations comparable to that of leukocytes ina lysed preparation; for example, an approximate resulting concentrationof 200 cell/μL is typical in both cases (platelets and erythrocytedebris will be small enough to be easily discriminated by appropriatetrigger settings on the detection channels). The interrogation volume inan exemplary embodiment of the invention may be around 145 pL; thisyields an average occupation number of around 0.029 cells (meaning that,on average, each cell is separated from another by about 35interrogation volumes). Even accounting for Poisson statistics, thepredicted coincidence rate for such concentrations is exceedingly low.Indeed, cell concentrations could be much higher than assumed herewithout resulting in any significant coincidence-related issues.

It is important to note that the assumed dilution ratio (about 1:20 forwhole blood) is entirely consistent with the extreme-throughput analysisrates typical of embodiments of the invention. By coupling thesubstantially nondiffracting Bessel beam edge-on with an extremely widebut thin core stream, embodiments of the invention may be capable ofoperating a particle analyzer, such as a flow cytometer, with avolumetric sample throughput of over 4,000 μL/minute a value about 40times that of current flow cytometers. At the projected core flow rateof approximately 4,300 μL/min, an entire 7.5-mL tube of peripheral wholeblood, diluted 1:20 in an erythrolytic reagent, may be analyzed in 35minutes: a dramatic improvement over the state of the art. Someembodiments of the invention may be capable of flows of about 10,000μL/minute, or about 100 times the typical volumetric throughput ofcurrent flow cytometers. The higher volumetric throughput of someembodiments may be achieved by generation of a ribbon-like sample corestream with a longer cross-sectional major axis, optionally with alonger minor cross-sectional axis, and with an interrogating light beamwith substantially nondiffracting behavior over a correspondingly longerdistance to encompass the longer propagation through the longcross-sectional dimension of the core stream.

Table 1 illustrates selected design and performance aspects of exemplaryand preferred embodiments of the invention.

TABLE 1 Exemplary Preferred Design Feature Embodiments embodiments corestream thickness 5-100 m >20 m (across light propagation) core streamwidth 50-5,000 m >400 m (along light propagation) core streamcross-section 250-500,000 m² >8,000 m² core stream aspect ratio4-200 >20 core stream flow speed 0.1-50 m/s >1 m/s

FIG. 1 illustrates a cross-section, perpendicular to the direction offluid flow, of a typical region of interaction between light and aparticle to be analyzed in a flowcell of the prior art. Internal surface110 of a flow cell is schematically indicated in the figure, andprovides a channel for fluid flow. Sheath fluid 120 is provided toconfine a fluid carrying particles to be analyzed. The sheath fluid andthe particle-carrying fluid are focused into a flowcell lumen, usuallyby hydrodynamic means, alternatively by acoustic focusing, channelmicrostructuring, deterministic lateral displacement, dielectrophoresis, or other particle-focusing means; such focusingproduces a tight sample core stream 130 bounded by the sheath fluid.Both the sheath fluid and the sample core stream flow in a direction xperpendicular to the plane of the page and toward the viewer. Aninterrogating Gaussian beam 140 with customary diffracting behavior isprovided to interact with the particles in the sample core stream 130.The light beam 140 propagates in a direction z substantiallyperpendicular to the flow direction. The beam 140, usually having aGaussian intensity profile, is generally focused into a relatively tightspot in the plane of the sample core stream 130. Due to the nature oflight waves and the principles of diffraction, a tight beam spot isproduced by a strongly converging input beam and results into a stronglydiverging output beam. As a consequence, the longitudinal range overwhich the beam spot is approximately uniform and tight (a range relatedto an optical quantity known in the art as the Rayleigh range) isrelatively small. The beam is generally focused in both directionsperpendicular to the direction of light propagation z, namely along thex axis and they axis

As illustrated in FIG. 2, some embodiments of the invention are capableof generating a core stream, elongated in the direction of lightpropagation, in a particle analyzer. FIG. 2 illustrates a cross-section,perpendicular to the direction of fluid flow, of the region ofinteraction between light and a particle to be analyzed in an embodimentof a flowcell of the current invention. Compared to the prior artillustrated in FIG. 1, a flowcell 200 is significantly elongated in thedirection of light propagation 201; a sample core stream 230 is tightonly in the transverse direction y perpendicular to light propagation,and extended in the direction z parallel to it; and an interrogatinglight beam 240 is provided having a non-Gaussian nature, designed toproduce an extended Rayleigh range. The propagation direction 201 oflight beam 240 is substantially aligned with the major cross-sectionalaxis (the z dimension in FIG. 2) of the extended sample core stream. Insome embodiments of the invention, the light propagation direction makesan angle of between 0 and 45 degrees with the major cross-sectional axisof the extended sample core stream to more directly expose particles inthe sample core stream to the interrogating light.

In flow cytometers of the prior art, the variation of local lightintensity over the illuminated portion of the sample core stream due todiffraction effects (i.e., convergence of the beam into and divergenceout of the beam waist plane) is generally on the order of less than 1%for typical core stream dimensions (around 10-20 μm) and beam waistdimensions (referring to FIG. 1, about 10-25 μm in the x flow directionand about 50-100 μm in the transversal y direction). Variations in lightintensity due to the shape of the beam profile are generally on theorder of 1 to 5%, and it is generally accepted that signal variationsdue to the interaction between the interrogating light beam and the corestream should be kept to less than about 5% to provide useful overallsystem results. In a flow cytometer of the prior art employingtraditional beams with customary diffraction properties, the maximumlongitudinal (referring to FIG. 1, z direction) core stream sizecompatible with these requirements is around 150 μm. The extendedRayleigh range of the non-Gaussian beam of the current invention mayachieve variations in light intensity below about 1% while allowinglongitudinal (referring to FIG. 2, z direction) core stream dimensionsof 400 μm or more; and it may achieve variations below about 5% withlongitudinal core stream dimensions of 1000 μm or more. Herein, beamshaving this property are referred to as “substantially nondiffracting”beams.

One example of a substantially nondiffracting beam having preferablepropagation characteristics to those of a Gaussian beam is a type ofbeam known in the art as a Bessel beam. One preferable feature of suchbeams is their ability to maintain an approximately uniform beam spotsize over longer ranges than is the case with normally diffractingGaussian beams of comparable intensity, wavelength, and minimum beamspot waist. This extended range, or extended depth of focus, makes itpossible to interrogate particles in a sample core stream extended inthe longitudinal direction z. Such extended sample core stream 230 isreferred to as ribbon-like on account of its much greater extentlongitudinally (along the direction of light propagation z) thantransversally (across the direction of light propagation, alongdirection y). The flowcell dimensions are designed in such a way as togenerate, e.g. through hydrodynamic focusing, a sample core stream withthe desired dimensions and cross-sectional aspect ratio. The core streamdimensions are alterable by control of sample core stream injectionpressure or flow rate, by control of sheath injection pressure or flowrate, and by control of the relationship between the two. Additionally,a degree of control can be exerted in terms of the location, along theflowcell microchannel, where the laser beam intersects the sample corestream, to take advantage of the hydrodynamic formation region where theflow profiles have not yet converged onto a translationally-invariantform.

FIG. 3 illustrates one possible embodiment of an optical device used toproduce a non-Gaussian beam in the present invention. A device 310referred to in the art as a Spatial Light Modulator (SLM) is provided tointeract by reflection with an ordinary input beam 320 having a Gaussianintensity distribution traveling along incoming propagation direction322, and produce a non-Gaussian output beam 330 having substantiallynondiffracting intensity and phase profiles traveling along outgoingpropagation direction 332. The interaction by reflection is effected bya plurality of elements 340 of the SLM, each of which is addressableindividually by electronic means to impart upon the portion of the inputbeam that strikes it a desired amount of phase shift. The input beam issized so as to overlap a number of individual SLM elements. The largerthe ratio between the area of the impinging input beam and the area ofindividual SLM elements, the finer the resolution and the control on thepropagation characteristics of the output beam. The individual SLMelements are programmed electronically to impart mathematically definedphase shifts to the portions of the beam that impinge upon each one, andresult in an output beam having substantially nondiffracting propagationcharacteristics, with a beam waist having an atypically long range ofapproximate uniformity. The location, downstream from the SLM, where theoutput beam acquires and maintains substantially nondiffracting waistcharacteristics, is designed to overlap with the location of theribbon-like sample core stream in the flowcell. An example of areflective-type SLM is one where each individually addressable element340 is a micromirror. Another, preferred example of a reflective-typeSLM is one where each individually addressable element 340 is a pixel ina two-dimensional liquid-crystal array with a reflective backplane, eachsuch pixel imparting a variable, desired phase shift on the portion ofthe wavefront that impinges on it upon propagation through the liquidcrystal to the reflective backplane and back out. To program SLM 310 todeliver the desired beam characteristics, one possible procedure startswith defining the desired beam profile and divergence behavior at acertain surface (e.g., the point of interrogation in the middle of thesample core stream), mathematically or computationally backpropagatingthe wavefronts to the surface of the SLM upstream in an optical model ofthe system based on descriptions, standard in the art, of the lightwaves in terms of Maxwell's equations or functionally equivalenttreatments, and thereby deriving the requirements for the SLMconfiguration necessary to then produce the desired effect in the actualforward-propagating implementation. Such calculations are periodicallyrefreshed by a processing unit on the basis of feedback from sensorsonboard the instrument, or on the basis of projected changes in theoptical or physical parameters of the system over factors including, forinstance, time, environmental conditions, and the refractive index ofmaterials.

FIG. 4 illustrates another possible embodiment of an optical device 410used to produce a substantially nondiffracting beam 430 in the presentinvention. It is similar in concept to the device illustrated in FIG. 3except that its interaction with the input beam 420 is by transmissionrather than by reflection. An example of a transmissive-type SLM is onewhere each of the individually addressable elements 440 is atransmission-type liquid-crystal pixel, arranged in a two-dimensionalarray. The incoming Gaussian beam 420 travels along incoming propagationdirection 422, experiences a phase shift programmable by pixel locationin SLM 410, and travels out along outgoing propagation direction 432 asa non-Gaussian, substantially nondiffracting beam 430. The process usedto determine the phase and/or intensity transformations needed from eachpixel 440 is similar to the one used to compute the analogoustransformations for optical device 310, one difference being that thetransformations in the case of device 410 are experienced duringtransmission rather than during reflection as in the case of device 310.

FIG. 5 illustrates another possible embodiment of an optical device 510used to produce a substantially nondiffracting beam 530 in the presentinvention. It is similar in concept to the device illustrated in FIG. 3except that instead of comprising means of dynamically changing theconfiguration of the individually addressable elements, it provides aphase/intensity mask 510 comprising a set of permanent, static phase-and/or intensity-control elements 540 predesigned to achieve a desiredeffect upon the impinging input beam 520. The incoming Gaussian beam 520travels along incoming propagation direction 522, experiences a phaseshift dependent on pixel location in mask 510, and travels out alongoutgoing propagation direction 532 as a non-Gaussian, substantiallynondiffracting beam 530. An example of a reflective-type phase/intensitymask is one where each predesigned phase-/intensity-control element 540is a microcolumn having a variably mirrored, optionally variablyoriented top facet and a height from baseline computed to result in thedesired phase shift and intensity modulation upon the impinging inputbeam, Means of producing such a permanent phase/intensity mask, a“static SLM,” include etching a silicon surface with the desiredtopographical characteristics (extent, elevation over baseline, surfaceorientation, and degree of reflectivity of individual wavefront controlelements) and using such surface as a master to produce molds out ofinexpensive material, such as, e.g., polymers, through a process such asinjection molding. In the case of a reflective-type static SLM, thepolymer molds would then be coated with a thin conformal layer ofreflective material such as metal (e.g., aluminum, silver, or gold,depending on the required reflectivity and the design wavelength range)to produce a two-dimensional array of static micromirrors. In accordancewith common practice in master/mold processing, the master siliconsurface is etched in such a way that the molds acquire the desiredtopography of micromirror elements—in other words, the etching programproduces a silicon surface complementary to the one ultimately desired.Alternative means of producing a reflective-type static SLM include, forinstance, hot embossing, micropatterning, microimprinting,micromachining, and additive manufacturing techniques such as 3-Dmanufacturing, laser sintering, and two-photon polymerization. Theprocess used to determine the phase and/or intensity transformationsneeded from each phase-/intensity-control element (pixel) 540 is similarto the one used to compute the analogous transformations for opticaldevice 310, one difference being that the properties in the case ofdevice 510 are fixed and therefore are calculated to address the mostlikely or common operating conditions encountered by the apparatus.

FIG. 6 illustrates another possible embodiment of an optical device 610used to produce a substantially nondiffracting beam 630 in the presentinvention. It is similar in concept to the device illustrated in FIG. 5except that its interaction with the input beam 620 is by transmissionrather than by reflection. The incoming Gaussian beam 620 travels alongincoming propagation direction 622, experiences a phase shift dependenton pixel location in mask 610, and travels out along outgoingpropagation direction 632 as a non-Gaussian, substantiallynondiffracting beam 630. An example of a transmissive-typephase/intensity mask is one where each of the predesignedphase-/intensity-control elements 640 is a transparent microcolumnhaving a height from baseline computed to result in the desired phaseshift and intensity modulation upon the impinging input beam.Manufacture of a transmissive-type static SLM may be realized by similarmeans to those described for the reflective-type static SLM in referenceto FIG. 5, except that the intermediate component (examples of whichinclude, for instance, polymer molds or laser-sintered glass) is notcoated with a metal layer, but may optionally be coated withantireflection layers optionally variable on a pixel-by-pixel basis. Theprocess used to determine the phase and/or intensity transformationsneeded from each phase-/intensity-control element (pixel) 640 is similarto the one used to compute the analogous transformations for opticaldevice 410, one difference being that the properties in the case ofdevice 610 are fixed and therefore are calculated to address the mostlikely or common operating conditions encountered by the apparatus.

FIG. 7 illustrates schematically a system configuration of an exemplaryembodiment of the present invention, which provides an apparatus forhigh-throughput analysis of single particles in a sample. A light source750, e.g., a laser, produces a beam 702 with desired wavelength, power,and dimensions. The beam is directed by means of relay optics 752 (whichcan include, for instance, lenses, mirrors, prisms, or optical fibers)as beam 722 to a spatial light modulator (SLM) 754. In the context ofthis application, relay optics will be intended to represent means totransmit a beam from one point in the system to another, and will alsobe intended to represent means to shape a beam in terms of dimensionsand convergence, divergence or collimation. In the context of thisapplication, SLM will be taken to mean both reflective- andtransmissive-type SLMs, and will also be taken to mean dynamic SLMs aswell as static phase/intensity masks. SLM 754 may be any one of opticaldevices 310, 410, 510, 610, from Figs., respectively, 3, 4, 5, or 6, orany other suitable optical device designed to achieve a substantiallysimilar phase and/or intensity transformation. In the case of a dynamicSLM, an SLM driver 756 provides the instructions 771 necessary toproduce in the SLM 754 the configuration of individually addressableelements to result in the desired output beam propagationcharacteristics. The output beam 732 from the SLM is directed to anotherset of relay optics 758 (which can include, for instance, lenses,mirrors, prisms, or optical fibers), which may additionally optionallyperform a focusing function. This second set of relay optics thendirects the beam 708 to the flowcell 700. The flowcell 700 provides forthe passage of particles to be analyzed (which can include, forinstance, cells, bacteria, exosomes, liposomes, microvesicles,microparticles, nanoparticles, and natural or synthetic microspheres) byconveying a sample stream 740 containing said particles and a stream ofsheath fluid 742 that surrounds and confines said sample stream, asdescribed above in reference to FIG. 2. An input portion of the flowcellfocuses, e.g., by hydrodynamic means, the sample stream and thesurrounding sheath stream to result in a tight sample core streamflowing through a microchannel portion of the flowcell, surrounded bysheath fluid. The sheath fluid and the sample core stream are directedto a single outlet 744 (and generally discarded as waste) after passagethrough the interrogation portion of the flowcell. The cross-section ofthe microchannel portion of the flowcell has an aspect ratio whereby thedimension perpendicular to the propagation of the interrogating lightbeam (direction y in FIG. 2) is much smaller than the dimension parallelto the propagation of the interrogating light beam (direction z in FIG.2). The aspect ratio of the flowcell cross-section is chosen to resultin the sample core stream having a tight dimension generallyperpendicular to the light beam and an extended dimension generallyaligned with the light beam. As the interrogating light beam interactswith particles in the sample core stream by scattering, absorption,fluorescence, and other means, light signals 710 are generated. Theselight signals are collected by relay optics in box 760 (which caninclude, for instance, single lenses, doublet lenses, multi-lenselements, mirrors, prisms, optical fibers, or waveguides) positionedaround the flowcell, then conveyed to filtering optics in box 760 (whichcan include, for instance, colored filters, dichroic filters, dichroicbeamsplitters, bandpass filters, longpass filters, shortpass filters,multiband filters, diffraction gratings, prisms, or holographic opticalelements) and then conveyed as filtered light signals 712 by furtherrelay optics in box 760 to one or more detectors 770 (which can include,for instance, photodiodes, avalanche photodiodes, photomultiplier tubes,silicon photomultipliers, or avalanche photodiode microcell arrays). Thedetectors convert the light signals 712 into electronic signals 772,which are optionally further amplified and groomed to reduce the impactof unwanted noise. The electronic signals are sent to an electronicprocessing unit 790 (which can include, for instance, a standalonecomputer, a single-board computer, a microprocessor, afield-programmable gate array, a digital signal processing board, or acombination of two or more of these), which executes further processingsteps upon the electronic signals. The processed signals 774 are thensent to a data storage unit 792 (which can include, for instance, aread-only memory unit, a flash memory unit, a hard-disk drive, anoptical storage unit, an external storage unit, or a remote or virtualstorage unit connected to the instrument by means of a wired datanetwork, a Wi-Fi link, an infrared communication link, or a cellulartelephony network link). The stored or preliminarily processed data, orboth, can also be made available to an operator for optional inspectionof results.

FIG. 8 illustrates schematically a system configuration of an exemplaryembodiment of the present invention, which provides an apparatus forhigh-throughput analysis and sorting of single particles in a sample. Itis similar in configuration to the system configuration of FIG. 7,except in that it additionally provides for the capability to sort andcollect particles based on their characteristics. The electronicprocessing unit 890 generates in real time sorting control signals 876based on the presence or absence or degree or nature of predeterminedcharacteristics of the particles to be analyzed. For example, it may bedesirable to identify and sort particles that, upon excitation by theinterrogating light beam, emit fluorescence in a predefined spectralband at a level above a predefined threshold. The processing unit, oncethe processed signals from each particle meet the predefined set ofsorting criteria, triggers a signal 876 conveyed to an actuator driver894. The actuator driver is an electronic control module connected toone or more sorting actuators 880. The sorting actuators may bepositioned in, on, next to, or near the flowcell in the vicinity of, anddownstream from, the interrogation region. One or more of the sortingactuators 880 is temporarily activated by drive signal 878 from theactuator driver 894 in response to the triggering signal 876 from theprocessing unit 890, resulting in a temporary diversion of the samplecore stream, or of a portion of the sample core stream, away from thedefault sorting channel 846 and into one or more sorting channels 848.The default sorting channel 846 optionally directs the fluids itreceives into a default receptacle 847. The sorting channels 848 directthe selected portions of the sample core stream to one or more receivingsorting receptacles 849. Following the temporary activation of one ormore of the sorting actuators 880, the actuator(s) return to theirresting state, and the sample core stream returns to its default sortingchannel 846. The sorting actuators 880 are controllable to achievemultiple actuation states, for instance, with an actuator driver 894,with a built-in control, with direct voltage or current control from theprocessing unit 890, or with electrical signals coming directly fromlogic circuitry connected with the one or more detectors 870.

In FIGS. 9, 10, and 11, the relative orientation of fluid flow, lightpropagation, and transverse directions is shown, respectively, as theset of axes z, and y, similarly to the depiction in FIG. 2.

FIG. 9 illustrates a cross-section, perpendicular to the direction offluid flow, of a possible light collection configuration of the presentinvention. The ribbon-like sample core stream 930 in a flowcell isilluminated by the interrogating substantially nondiffracting beam 940.Particles (of which a representative particle 955 is shown, at one ofthe many possible locations within the cross section of the sample corestream) to be analyzed in the sample core stream interact with light inthe beam 940 to generate light signals 910 by optical processesincluding, for instance, scattering, absorption, or fluorescence. Thelight signals 910 are collected by collection optics 960. The collectedlight signals 912 are then conveyed to spectral filtering optics 962 toselect appropriate spectral bands of the light signals for detection.The spectral filtering optics 962 may be, for instance, reflective,transmissive, absorptive, diffractive, or holographic in nature or basedon interference, or a combination thereof. The resulting spectrallyfiltered light signals 914 are then conveyed as signals 916 by focusingoptics 964 to a detector 970. The detector converts the light signals916 into electrical signals 972, which are then conveyed to a processingunit 990 for further analysis, processing, and optionally storage, asdescribed above in reference to FIGS. 7 and 8. Together, the collectionoptics 960 and the focusing optics 964 may be referred to as relayoptics.

In some embodiments, more than one spectral band output may begenerated. For instance, FIG. 10 illustrates a cross-section,perpendicular to the direction of fluid flow, of another possible lightcollection configuration of the present invention. It is similar inconcept to the configuration illustrated in FIG. 9 except that thespectral filtering optics 1062 produce more than one spectral bandoutput 1014 (A and B), separated according to spectral characteristics.Each spectral band is then conveyed to a separate set of focusing optics1064 (A and B) and separate detectors 1070 (A and B), resulting inrespectively separate electrically converted signals 1072 (A and B).FIG. 10 depicts, for the sake of clarity, two sets of spectral bands,focusing optics, and detectors; it will be apparent to those skilled inthe art that an arbitrary number of such sets is encompassed by thescope of the invention.

FIG. 11 illustrates a cross-section, perpendicular to the direction offluid flow, of yet another possible light collection configuration ofthe present invention. It provides for a similar set of collection,spectral filtering, and focusing functions as described for FIG. 9; andin addition it also preserves the spatial location information of theparticles 1155 in the ribbon-like sample core stream 1130. The opticallayout of this configuration is referred to in the art as an imaginglayout. An image of the portion of the sample core stream 1130illuminated by the interrogating substantially nondiffracting beam 1140is formed by imaging and spectral filtering optics 1160 (which caninclude, for instance, single lenses, doublet lenses, multi-lenselements, mirrors, prisms, optical fibers, or waveguides) onto thedetector array 1170. An example of imaging optics is a set of twopositive (e.g., planoconvex, biconvex, best-form, aspherical, orcompound achromatic doublet or other multi-element) lenses, each placedat distances corresponding to their respective effective focal lengths,the first (closest to the flowcell) its focal length away from the x-zplane of the ribbon-like sample core stream, the second (closest to thedetector array) its focal length away from the x-z plane of the activesurface of the detector array; some distance interposed in between thetwo. Spectral filtering optics may be inserted in the space between thetwo lenses. The light rays 1110 from a single particle 1155 arecollected, passed through imaging and spectral filtering optics 1160 asdescribed above in relationship to FIG. 9, and relayed onto the detectorarray 1170. The detector array may be, for instance; a linear array ofdetector elements 1175 or a two-dimensional array of detector elements1175. The dimension of the detector array corresponding to the longdimension of the sample core stream cross-section (i.e., that alongdirection z) is designed to image the sample core stream so that amonotonic, 1:1 mapping relationship is created between positions ofparticles like particle 1155 within the sample core stream 1130 alongdirection z and positions along said dimension of the detector array.The light signals from a single particle being analyzed may result in asingle element or in multiple elements 1177 of the detector array beingilluminated. It is not necessary for a conventional digital image (i.e.,consisting of multiple pixels in a two-dimensional array) of any of theparticles like particle 1155 to be formed onto detector array 1170; thenature of the imaging optics 1160 referred herein is characterized bythe relatively faithful, relatively, undistorted reproduction, whethermagnified, minified, or unchanged in size, of objects on the objectplane (i.e., the illuminated portion of the sample core stream) asimages on the conjugate image plane (i.e., the detector array). Thisfaithful reproduction is referred to in the art as an “image” whether ornot any given particle under analysis is detected by more than oneelement of the detector array (thereby forming a traditional,multi-pixel image) or by just a single element of the detector array.The detector array 1170 converts the light signal information 1112impinging upon one or more of its illuminated elements 1177 intoelectronic signals 1172 conveyed to a processing unit for furtheranalysis, processing, and optionally storage, as described above inreference to FIGS. 7 and 8.

The plurality of detectors in the embodiment disclosed above isdescribed in a preferred embodiment as an array. It should be understoodthan any suitable plurality of detectors may be used for the purpose asindicated, whether configured as an array or otherwise.

Whereas preferred embodiments of the invention comprise a plurality ofdetectors, embodiments with a single detector are included under thescope of the invention. Their construction may be entirely analogous toany single one of the plurality of detectors.

FIGS. 12 (a) and 12 (b) illustrate exemplary embodiments of two steps ofa high-throughput analysis and sorting method of the current invention.In FIGS. 12 (a) and 12 (b), the relative orientation of fluid flow,light propagation, and transverse directions is shown as the set of axesx, z, and y, respectively. The assignment of the axes and directions issimilar to that in FIG. 2, however the orientation of the axes withrespect to the page is rotated as compared to FIG. 2, with the lightpropagation and flow directions being in the plane of the page in FIGS.12 (a) and (b). Each of the two figures shows a schematic representationof a side view of the interrogation region 1231 and sorting region 1232of the flowcell 1200. The focusing region of the flowcell, if provided,e.g., by hydrodynamic means, is to the left of the picture; theribbon-like sample core stream 1230, surrounded by the sheath fluid1220, comes in from the left and flows towards the right. The sheathfluid 1220 is bounded by the inner walls of the flowcell 1200, and thesample core stream 1230 is bounded by the sheath fluid 1220. In theinterrogation region 1231 at left, the substantially nondiffracting beam1240 is delivered to the flowcell by external optics and intersects thesample core stream 1230. In the sorting region 1232 at right, one ormore actuators (shown in the picture as an actuator array 1280) areprovided in contact with or near the flowcell, positioned in such a wayas to overlay the position of the sample core stream 1230.

FIG. 12 (a) shows a first time step in the processing of a samplewhereby a single particle 1255 in the sample core stream 1230 enters theinterrogation region 1231 (where the beam 1240 intersects the samplecore stream 1230). The light-particle interaction generates lightsignals as described above in reference to FIG. 11, which light signalsare collected and relayed to a detector array. Based on the design ofthe imaging optical layout, the detector array registers the position,across the ribbon-like sample core stream 1230 along direction z, of theparticle 1255, and conveys that information to a processing unit asillustrated schematically in FIG. 8. As described above in reference toFIG. 8, the processing unit uses that information to produce atriggering signal for an actuator driver, which driver in turn activatesan element of the actuator array 1280 in FIG. 12 (a). FIG. 12 (b) showsa second time step in the processing of the sample whereby the particle1255 detected in the step depicted in FIG. 12 (a), after following path1265 in the flowcell along direction x, arrives at a point in thevicinity of the actuator array 1280 in the sorting region 1232 of theflowcell. The design of the imaging optical layout and of the detection,processing, and control electronics is such that the actuator element1287 that is activated is the element calculated, estimated, predictedor found upon calibration or determined empirically during instrumentdesign or assembly to be nearest to a passing particle following asimilar path. The timing of the triggering signal (i.e., the relativedelay from particle detection to sorting actuation) is designed to takeinto account both the average velocity of fluid flow in the flowcell andits spatial profile across the flowcell cross-section, according to thecharacteristics of Poiseuille flow known in the art and as modifiedbased on empirical or modeling information. The triggering delays foreach of the actuator elements 1287 are likewise calculated, calibratedor determined.

The plurality of actuators in the embodiment disclosed above isdescribed in a preferred embodiment as an array. It should be understoodthan any suitable plurality of actuators may be used for the purpose asindicated, whether configured as an array or otherwise.

Whereas preferred embodiments of the invention comprise a plurality ofactuators, embodiments with a single actuator are included under thescope of the invention. Their construction may be entirely analogous toany single one of the plurality of actuators.

In FIGS. 13 (a), 13 (b), and 17, the relative orientation of fluid flow,light propagation, and transverse directions is shown as the set of axesx, z, and y, respectively. The assignment of the axes and directions issimilar to that in FIG. 2; however the orientation of the axes withrespect to the page is rotated as compared to FIG. 2, with the fluidflow and transverse directions being in the plane of the page in FIGS.13 (a), 13 (b), and 17.

FIG. 13 (a) is a schematic isometric depiction of the sorting region ofthe flowcell in a default state of one representative embodiment of thecurrent invention. The focusing region of the flowcell, e.g., byhydrodynamic means, if provided, is to the left of the picture; theribbon-like sample core stream 1330, surrounded by the sheath fluid1320, comes in from the left and flows towards the right. The flowcell1300 splits into two channels in the sorting region: the default sortingchannel 1346 and the sorting channel 1348. The actuator array 1380 isdepicted as embodied in, in contact with, or in proximity of the innerwall of the flowcell on the default sorting channel side. In thisillustration of the default state, all the actuator elements are in theOFF state, resulting in the entire sample core stream 1330 flowing bydesign into the default sorting channel 1346.

FIG. 13 (b) is a schematic isometric depiction of the sorting region ofthe flowcell in an exemplary sorting state of one representativeembodiment of the current invention. The elements depicted common toFIG. 13 (a) are as described above in reference to FIG. 13 (a). In thisillustration of an exemplary sorting state, one of the actuator elements1387 in the array 1380 is activated, while the rest are in the OFFstate. Selection of the actuator element (or elements) for activation isbased on the prior detection step using a detector array, as describedabove in reference to FIGS. 11 and 12 (a) and 12 (b). Activation of theindicated actuator element 1387 results in the diversion into thesorting channel 1348 of the sorted portion 1331 of the sample corestream closest to the activated element, which portion contains adesired particle 1355 detected upstream and automatically selected byanalysis algorithms to trigger sorting actuation, while the rest of thesample core stream 1330 continues to flow undiverted into the defaultsorting channel 1346.

In FIGS. 14 (a) and (b), 15 (a) and (b), 16 (a) and (b), and 18 (a)-(d),the relative orientation of fluid flow, light propagation, andtransverse directions is shown as the set of axes x, z, and y,respectively. The assignment of the axes and directions is similar tothat in FIG. 2, however the orientation of the axes with respect to thepage is rotated as compared to FIG. 2, with the fluid flow andtransverse directions being in the plane of the page in FIGS. 14 (a) and(b), 15 (a) and (b), 16 (a) and (b), and 18 (a)-(d). The cross-sectionalplane depicted in FIGS. 14 (a) and 14 (b), 15 (a) and (b), 16 (a) and(b), and 18 (a)-(d) is the plane that contains the particle beinganalyzed and sorted.

FIGS. 14 (a) and 14 (b) illustrate one embodiment of two states of thehigh-throughput sorting method of the current invention. Each of the twofigures shows a schematic representation of a cross-sectional view ofthe sorting region of the flowcell. Similarly to the situation depictedin FIGS. 13 (a) and (b), the focusing region of the flowcell, e.g., byhydrodynamic means, if provided, is to the left of the picture; theribbon-like sample core stream 1430, surrounded by the sheath fluid1420, comes in from the left and flows towards the right. The flowcell1400 splits into two channels in the sorting region: the default sortingchannel 1446 and the sorting channel 1448. An element 1487 of theactuator array is depicted as embodied in, in contact with, or inproximity of the inner wall of the flowcell 1400 on the default sortingchannel side. Similarly to the state depicted in FIG. 13 (a), FIG. 14(a) shows the configuration of the default state, where with theactuator element 1487 in the OFF state, the portion of the sample corestream 1430 shown in this cross-sectional view flows by design into thedefault sorting channel 1446. Similarly to the state depicted in FIG. 13(b), FIG. 14 (b) shows the configuration of the sorting state, wherewith the actuator element 1487 in the ON state, a transient gas, vapor,or gas-vapor bubble, or a region of heated or cooled, less-dense sheathfluid 1495 is generated (by means including, for instance, thermalmeans, electrolytic means, and gas injection means), which creates alocalized flow diversion in the depicted cross-sectional plane and inits immediate vicinity, which diversion deflects the portion 1431 of thesample core stream shown in this cross-sectional view into the sortingchannel 1448, which portion contains a particle 1455 detected upstreamand automatically selected by analysis algorithms to trigger sortingactuation. Following deactivation of the depicted actuator element 1487,the transient gas, vapor, gas-vapor bubble or region of less-dense fluid1495 shrinks or is cleared away, and the flow pattern returns to theoriginal default state of FIG. 14 (a).

FIGS. 15 (a) and 15 (h) illustrate another embodiment of two states ofthe high-throughput sorting method of the current invention. It issimilar to the embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 14 (a) and 14 (b), exceptin the design and nature of actuation. Here the actuators in the array(of which a representative element 1587 is shown in this cross-sectionalview) are located in proximity to a expandable chamber 1597 adjacent tothe flowcell inner wall and separated from the sheath fluid 1520 by aflexible membrane 1596. With the actuator element 1587 in the OFF ordefault state as shown in FIG. 15 (a), the expandable chamber 1597 is inits default configuration at a pressure designed to match the pressureof the fluid inside the flowcell at the location of the membrane,resulting in a flat shape of the membrane to match the shape of theflowcell inner wall. With the actuator element 1587 in the ON or sortingstate as shown in FIG. 15 (b), the expandable chamber 1597 ispressurized (by means including, for instance, thermal means, mechanicalmeans, hydraulic and gas injection means) to a higher pressure than inthe default configuration; this pressure differential causes themembrane 1596 to flex into the flowcell until a new equilibrium isreached. The bulging membrane causes the flow pattern to shift in asimilar way to that previously shown for FIG. 14 (b), resulting in theshown portion 1531 of the sample core stream being diverted into thesorting channel 1548, which portion contains a particle 1555 detectedupstream and automatically selected by analysis algorithms to triggersorting actuation. Following deactivation of the depicted actuatorelement 1587, the expandable chamber 1597 is allowed to or made toreturn to its default pressure state, the membrane 1596 returns to itsdefault flat shape, and the flow pattern returns to the original defaultconfiguration of FIG. 15 (a).

FIGS. 16 (a) and 16 (b) illustrate yet another embodiment of two statesof the high-throughput sorting method of the current invention. It issimilar to the embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 15 (a) and 15 (b), exceptin the design of actuation. Sorting actuation here is realized by meansof two actuator arrays, positioned on opposite sides of the flowcell,each element of each array (of which a pair of two representativeelements is shown in this cross-sectional view, element 1688 for thedefault-side array and element 1689 for the sort-side array) beinglocated in proximity to expandable chambers (1697 for the default sideand 1699 for the sort side) adjacent to the flowcell inner wall andseparated from the sheath fluid by a flexible membrane (1696 for thedefault side and 1698 for the sort side). In the default state, depictedin FIG. 16 (a), the expandable chambers 1697 and 1699 of both thedefault-side and sort-side actuator elements are in their defaultconfiguration at a pressure designed to match the pressure of the fluidinside the flowcell at the location of the membranes 1696 and 1698,resulting in flat shapes of the membranes to match the shape of theflowcell inner walls. In the sorting state, depicted in FIG. 16 (b), theexpandable chamber 1697 of the default-side actuator element 1688 ispressurized (by means including, for instance; heating means, mechanicalmeans, hydraulic means, and gas injection means), through actuation, ina similar way as depicted in reference to FIG. 15 (b); this pressuredifferential with respect to the local pressure in the sheath fluidcauses the membrane 1696 to bulge into the flowcell until a newequilibrium is reached. Simultaneously, the expandable chamber 1699 ofthe sorting side actuator element 1689 is depressurized (by meansincluding, for instance, cooling means, mechanical means, hydraulicmeans, and gas aspiration means), through actuation, to a lower pressurethan in the default configuration; this pressure differential withrespect to the local pressure in the sheath fluid causes the membrane1698 to flex away from the flowcell until a new equilibrium is reached.The combination of the inwardly bulging default-side membrane 1696 andthe outwardly flexing sort-side membrane 1698 causes the flow pattern toshift in a similar way to that previously shown for FIGS. 14 (b) and 15(b), resulting in the shown portion 1631 of the sample core stream beingdiverted into the sorting channel 1648, which portion contains aparticle 1655 detected upstream and automatically selected by analysisalgorithms to trigger sorting actuation. Following deactivation of thedepicted actuator element pair, both the default-side and the sort-sideexpandable chambers 1697 and 1699 are allowed to or made to return totheir default pressure states, both the default-side and the sort-sidemembranes 1696 and 1698 return to their default flat shapes, and theflow pattern returns to the original default configuration of FIG. 16(a).

FIG. 17 is a schematic isometric depiction of the sorting region of theflowcell in an exemplary sorting state of another representativeembodiment of the current invention. The configuration is similar tothat depicted in reference to FIG. 13 (h), except that instead of asingle sorting channel, a plurality of sorting channels 1748 is providedalong a direction z parallel to the direction of light propagation andto the major cross-sectional axis of the ribbon-like sample core stream1730 (which is bounded by sheath fluid 1720). One advantage of thisembodiment is the ability to have a plurality of different receptaclesinto which the sample may be sorted, depending on the location withinthe sample core stream 1730 where a desired particle is detected by anupstream detector array as described above in reference to FIG. 11.There may exist a relationship between some elements in the actuatorarray 1780 and the sorting channels 1748, whereby activation of certainactuator elements (e.g., 1787, as depicted) may correspond to diversionof the corresponding portion (e.g., 1731) of the sample core streampreferentially into one sorting channel (e.g., 1749), which portioncontains a particle 1755 detected upstream and automatically selected byanalysis algorithms to trigger sorting actuation; while for otherelements in the actuator array, the corresponding sample core stream maybe diverted partially into one sorting channel and partially intoanother. In the embodiment of FIG. 17, a smaller number of sortingchannels 1748 is shown than the number of elements in the actuator array1780; other embodiments of the current invention include the number ofsorting channels 1748 being smaller than, equal to, or greater than thenumber of elements in the actuator array 1780. Also for illustrativeclarity, the elements in the actuator array 1780 are shown as beingadjacent to one another; other embodiments of the current inventioninclude the elements in the actuator array being positioned so as tointerpose a certain space in between each element and the ones adjacentto it.

FIGS. 18 (a)-(d) illustrate a multi-way sorting embodiment of thehigh-throughput sorting method of the current invention. Each of thefour figures shows a schematic representation of a cross-sectional viewof the sorting region of the flowcell. The configuration is similar tothat depicted in reference to FIGS. 14 (a) and (b), except that insteadof a single sorting channel, a plurality of sorting channels 1841-1844is provided along a transverse direction y. One advantage of thisembodiment is the ability to have a plurality of different receptaclesinto which the sample may be sorted, depending on the result of theupstream analysis by the interrogating light beam, the signal detectors;and associated electronic and logic trigger circuitry. For example, thesignals detected in response to the upstream interrogation of the samplemay indicate that a particle, e.g., particle 1851, was detected with acertain set A of properties targeted for selection (e.g., the presenceof surface antigens or intracellular markers associated with certainkinds of cancer cells). It may be desirable to sort particles havingthese properties into a certain collection receptacle, e.g., oneprovided to receive the outflow from sorting channel 1841, asillustrated in FIG. 18 (b). Another particle, e.g., particle 1852, mayflow past the interrogation point and produce signals that indicate thepresence of a different set B of properties targeted for selection(e.g., the presence of surface antigens or intracellular markersassociated with certain kinds of stem cells). It would be desirable tosort particles like particle 1852 having set-B properties into adifferent receptacle from that designed for collection of particleshaving set-A properties: e.g., a receptacle provided to receive theoutflow from sorting channel 1842, as illustrated in FIG. 18 (c).Likewise for yet another set D of properties, particles like particle1854 detected as having those properties, and a sorting channel 1844designed to flow into a receptacle to collect such particles.Accordingly, the embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 18 (a)-(d) provides anexample of such a multi-way sorting capability of the current invention;with a number of sorting channels 1841-1844 in addition to the defaultsorting channel 1846. FIGS. 18 (a)-(d) exemplarily show four suchsorting channels explicitly. It will be apparent to those skilled in theart that additional configurations having more or less than four sortingchannels, in addition to the default sorting channel, do not depart fromthe scope of the disclosed invention.

Each of the sorting channels 1841-1844 (as well as the default sortingchannel 1846) may optionally be connected with a receiving receptacledesigned to collect the fluid flow from the respective channel. Theselection of a particular sorting channel (or of the default sortingchannel) as the target for reception of a desired sorted portion of thesample core stream is effected by actuation of one (or more) of theelements 1887 of an actuator array. In a two-way sort there are twoprincipal sorting states, which can be described as OFF (default) and ON(sorting) as described above, with respect to any one of the elements inthe actuator array, in relation to FIGS. 14 (a)-(b), 15 (a)-(b), and 16(a)-(b). In a multi-way sort, on the other hand, there generally can beas many sorting states as there are sorting “ways” or possible sortingchannels. With reference to FIGS. 18 (a)-(d), five possible sortingchannels are indicated (the default sorting channel 1846 plus foursorting channels 1841-1844); accordingly, this is referred to as afive-way sort. An actuation process is provided to result in differentdegrees of deflection of the sample core stream portion, correspondingto the selection of different sorting channels.

In FIG. 18 (a) an element 1887 of an actuator array is depicted asembodied in, in contact with, or in proximity of the inner wall of theflowcell 1800 on the default sorting channel side. Similarly to thestate depicted in FIG. 14 (a), FIG. 18 (a) shows the configuration ofthe default state, where with the actuator element 1887 in the OFFstate, the portion of the sample core stream 1830 shown in thiscross-sectional view flows by design into the default sorting channel1846. Similarly to the state depicted in FIG. 14 (b), FIGS. 18 (b)-(d)show the configurations of various sorting states, where with theactuator element 1887 in the ON state at levels 1, 2, and 4,respectively, transient regions 1891, 1892, and 1894, respectively(comprising, for instance, a gas, vapor, gas-vapor bubble, or aless-dense region of sheath fluid), are generated (by means including,for instance, thermal means, electrolytic means, and gas injectionmeans), which create respective localized flow diversions in thedepicted cross-sectional plane and in its immediate vicinity, whichdiversions deflect the portions 1831, 1832, and 1834, respectively, ofthe sample core stream shown in this cross-sectional view, and thecorresponding particles 1851, 1852, and 1854, respectively, into therespective sorting channels 1841, 1842, and 1844. Following deactivationof the depicted actuator element, the transient gas bubble shrinks or iscleared away, and the flow pattern returns to the original default stateof FIG. 18 (a). Not shown is the configuration of a sorting stateintermediate to the sorting states of FIGS. 18 (c) and 18 (d),corresponding to an actuation level 3, whereby a transient region of asize intermediate between that of regions 1892 and 1894 diverts aportion of the sample core stream shown in this cross-sectional viewinto sorting channel 1843.

The depictions in FIGS. 14 (a), 15 (a), 16 (a), and 18 (a) are describedabove as representing the default states of the sorting region of theflowcell in the respective embodiments of the current invention, in thecross-sectional plane containing the actuator element being activated.They also represent the sorting states of the sorting region of theflowcell in each of the cross-sectional planes containing the remainingactuator elements (those not being activated). In other words, the flowpattern of the sample core stream is designed to be affected mainly onlylocally in the vicinity of the plane containing the actuator elementbeing activated, while the flow patterns of the sample core streamoutside this plane are designed to remain mainly unaffected by suchactivation. FIG. 13 (b) schematically summarizes this aspect of theinvention.

Throughout this disclosure the term “default sorting channel” has beenassociated with an OFF state of an actuator or actuator element,signifying a passive state in which no particle sorting is performed,and associated parts of a core stream are typically collected anddiscarded as waste. The term “sorting channel” has been associated withan ON state of an actuator or actuator element, signifying an activatedstate of an actuator or actuator element, in which active sorting of aparticle is performed. While for some embodiments this may be apreferred configuration, the invention is not so limited, and includedunder the scope of the invention are embodiments where a passive stateof an actuator or actuator element is associated with particlecollection, and an active state of an actuator or actuator element isassociated with generation of a waste stream from the particle analyzer.

FIG. 19 shows a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a dataprocessing system 1900 to provide a high-throughput single-particleanalysis and sorting system as described herein. In an embodiment, dataprocessing system 1900 is a part of the control system to perform amethod that includes forming a ribbon-like sample core stream; forming asubstantially nondiffracting interrogation light beam; conveyingparticles in the core stream for analysis by the substantiallynondiffracting light beam; providing means of sorting actuation based onsuch analysis; and sorting particles, as described herein. In someembodiments, data processing system 1900 is represented by any one ofelectronic processing units 790, 890, and 990 depicted in FIGS. 7, 8,and 9, respectively.

Data processing system 1900 includes a processing unit 1901 that mayinclude a microprocessor or microprocessor, such as Intel microprocessor(e.g., Core i7, Core 2 Duo, Core 2 Quad, Atom), Sun Microsystemsmicroprocessor (e.g., SPARC), IBM microprocessor (e.g., IBM 750),Motorola microprocessor Motorola 68000), Advanced Micro Devices (“AMD”)microprocessor, Texas Instrument microcontroller, and any othermicroprocessor or microcontroller.

Processing unit 1901 may include a personal computer (PC), such as aMacintosh® (from Apple Inc. of Cupertino, Calif.), Windows®-based PC(from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash.), or one of a wide varietyof hardware platforms that run the UNIX operating system or otheroperating systems. For at least some embodiments, processing unit 1901includes a general purpose or specific purpose data processing systembased on Intel, AMD, Motorola, IBM, Sun Microsystems, IBM processorfamilies, or any other processor families. As shown in FIG. 19, a memory1903 is coupled to the processing unit 1901 by a bus 1923. Memory 1903has instructions and data 1904 stored thereon which when accessed byprocessing unit 1901 cause the processing unit 1901 to perform methodsto provide label free or native particle analysis, as described herein.

Memory 1903 can be dynamic random access memory (“DRAM”) and can alsoinclude static random access memory (“SRAM”). A bus 1923 couplesprocessing unit 1901 to memory 1903 and also to a non-volatile storage1909 and to a display controller 1905 (if a display is used) and to aninput/output (I/O) controller(s) 1911. Display controller 1905 controlsin the conventional manner a display on a display device 1907 which canbe a cathode ray tube (CRT), liquid crystal display (LCD), or any otherdisplay device. Input/output devices 1917 can include a keyboard, diskdrives, printers, a scanner, a camera, and other input and outputdevices, including a mouse or other pointing device. I/O controller 1911is coupled to one or more audio input devices 1913 such as, for example,one or more microphones.

Display controller 1905 and I/O controller 1911 can be implemented withconventional well-known technology. An audio output 1915 such as, forexample, one or more speakers, may be coupled to I/O controller 1911.Non-volatile storage 1909 is often a magnetic hard disk, an opticaldisk, or another form of storage for large amounts of data. Some of thisdata is often written, by a direct memory access process, into memory1903 during execution of software in data processing system 1900 toperform methods described herein.

One of skilled in the art will immediately recognize that the terms“computer-readable medium” and “machine-readable medium” include anytype of storage device that is accessible by processing unit 1901, Dataprocessing system 1900 can interface to external systems through a modemor network interface 1921. It will be appreciated that modem or networkinterface 1921 can be considered to be part of data processing system1900. This interface 1921 can be an analog modem, ISDN modem, cablemodem, token ring interface, satellite transmission interface, or otherinterfaces for coupling a data processing system to other dataprocessing systems.

It will be appreciated that data processing system 1900 is one exampleof many possible data processing systems which have differentarchitectures. For example, personal computers based on an Intelmicroprocessor often have multiple buses, one of which can be aninput/output (I/O) bus for the peripherals and one that directlyconnects processing unit 1901 and memory 1903 (often referred to as amemory bus). The buses are connected together through bridge componentsthat perform any necessary translation due to differing bus protocols.

Network computers are another type of data processing system that can beused with the embodiments as described herein. Network computers do notusually include a hard disk or other mass storage, and the executableprograms are loaded from a network connection into memory 1903 forexecution by processing unit 1901. A typical data processing system willusually include at least a processor, memory, and a bus coupling thememory to the processor.

It will also be appreciated that data processing system 1900 can becontrolled by operating system software which includes a file managementsystem, such as a disk operating system, which is part of the operatingsystem software. Operating system software can be the family ofoperating systems known as Macintosh® Operating System (Mac OS®) or MacOS X® from Apple Inc, of Cupertino, Calif., or the family of operatingsystems known as Windows® from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash.,and their associated file management systems. The file management systemis typically stored in non-volatile storage 1909 and causes processingunit 1901 to execute the various acts required by the operating systemto input and output data and to store data in memory, including storingfiles on non-volatile storage 1909.

In various embodiments; hardwired circuitry may be used in combinationwith software instructions to implement methods described herein. Anon-transitory machine readable medium can be used to store software anddata which when executed by a data processing system causes the systemto perform various methods described herein. This executable softwareand data may be stored in various places including for example ROM,volatile RAM, non-volatile memory, and/or cache. Portions of thissoftware and/or data may be stored in any one of these storage devices.

Thus, a machine readable medium includes any mechanism that provides(i.e., stores and/or transmits) information in a form accessible by amachine (e.g., a computer, network device, or any device with a set ofone or more processors, etc.). For example, a machine readable mediumincludes recordable/non-recordable media (e.g., read only memory (ROM);random access memory (RAM); magnetic disk storage media; optical storagemedia; flash memory devices; and the like).

The methods as described herein can be implemented using dedicatedhardware e.g.; using Field. Programmable Gate Arrays, or ApplicationSpecific Integrated Circuit) or shared circuitry (e.g., microprocessorsor microcontrollers) under control of program instructions stored in amachine-readable medium. The methods as described herein can also beimplemented as computer instructions for execution on a data processingsystem, such as system 1900 of FIG. 19.

A method of analyzing particles in a fluid using a particle analyzer isdisclosed, comprising the steps of:

creating a ribbon-like core stream having a largest cross-sectionaldimension;

exposing the ribbon-like core stream to a non-Gaussian, substantiallynondiffracting light beam in a flowcell;

creating a signal resulting from the interaction of the non-Gaussian,substantially nondiffracting light beam with a particle in the fluid;and

detecting the signal with a detector.

A method of analyzing and sorting particles in a fluid using a particleanalyzer is disclosed, comprising the steps of:

creating a ribbon-like core stream having a largest cross-sectionaldimension;

exposing the ribbon-like core stream to a non-Gaussian, substantiallynondiffracting light beam in a flowcell;

creating a signal resulting from the interaction of the non-Gaussian,substantially nondiffracting light beam with a particle in the fluid;

detecting the signal with a detector;

transferring the signal to a sorting actuator driver through aprocessing unit;

bringing a sorting actuator into a desired sorting state with thesorting actuator driver in response to the signal; and

using the desired sorting state of the sorting actuator to direct a partof the core stream with the particle to a desired sorting channel.

A method of analyzing particles in a fluid using a particle analyzer isdisclosed, comprising the steps of:

creating a ribbon-like core stream having a largest cross-sectionaldimension;

exposing the ribbon-like core stream to a non-Gaussian, substantiallynondiffracting light beam in a flowcell;

creating a signal resulting from the interaction of the non-Gaussian,substantially nondiffracting light beam with a particle in the fluid;

detecting the signal with a detector;

wherein the detector is one of a plurality of detectors, wherebyindividual detectors are configured to receive a signal from acorresponding portion of the exposed ribbon-like core stream.

A method of analyzing and sorting particles in a fluid using a particleanalyzer is disclosed, comprising the steps of:

creating a ribbon-like core stream having a largest cross-sectionaldimension;

exposing the ribbon-like core stream to a non-Gaussian, substantially,nondiffracting light beam in a flowcell;

creating a signal resulting from the interaction of the non-Gaussian,substantially nondiffracting light beam with a particle in the fluid;

detecting the signal with a detector;

transferring the signal to a sorting actuator driver through aprocessing unit;

bringing a sorting actuator into a desired sorting state with thesorting actuator driver in response to the signal;

using the desired sorting state of the sorting actuator to direct a partof the core stream with the particle to a desired sorting channel;

wherein the detector is one of a plurality of detectors, wherebyindividual detectors are configured to receive a signal from acorresponding portion of the exposed ribbon-like core stream, and

wherein the sorting actuator is one of a plurality of sorting actuators;the plurality of sorting actuators being in substantial alignment withthe largest cross-sectional dimension of the ribbon-like core stream.

In the foregoing specification, embodiments of the invention have beendescribed with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. Itwill, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may bemade thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of theinvention. It will be clear to those skilled in the art that thecombinations of the various aspects of the invention disclosed hereinare encompassed in the disclosure and do not depart from the scope ofthe invention. For example, any of the methods and configurationsdisclosed in reference to actuation (e.g., the configurations shown inFIGS. 14 (a) and (b), 15 (a) and (b), and 16 (a) and (b) may be combinedwith any of the methods and configurations disclosed in reference tosorting channels (e.g., the configurations shown in FIGS. 13 (a) and(b), 17, and 18 (a)-(d)). Likewise, any of the methods andconfigurations disclosed in reference to optical collection anddetection (e.g., the configurations shown in FIGS. 9, 10, and 11) may becombined with any of the actuation and sorting configurations, and anyof the methods and configurations disclosed in reference to SLMs may becombined with any of the optical collection and detection, and actuationand sorting configurations. As a particular example, the combination ofthe sorting configuration illustrated in FIG. 17 may be combined withthe sorting configuration illustrated in FIGS. 18 (a)-(d) to result in atwo-dimensional array of sorting channels, one dimension along directionz and one dimension along direction y, providing for a multiplicity ofsorting options according to both location within the ribbon-like samplecore stream and result of optical interrogation. As another example,embodiments illustrated or described herein as employing detector arraysand actuator arrays may alternatively be implemented using single-pointdetectors and single actuators: in this latter case, the illustrationsof FIGS. 14 (a) and (b), 15 (a) and (b), 16 (a) and (b), and 18 (a)-(d)are to be taken as schematic representations of cross-sectionalprojections through the flowcell rather than of single cross-sectionalplanes; and in FIG. 13 (b), actuation of the entire actuator results inthe temporary sorting of the entire cross-section of the ribbon-likecore stream 1330, rather than of just portion 1331, into sorting channel1348, As yet another particular example, in some embodiments of theinvention the relationship between the default sorting channel and thesorting channel (as, e.g., illustrated in FIGS. 13 (a) and (b)) may beinverted, where the actuator elements of actuator array 1380 are allnormally in the ON state, delivering the entire sample core stream 1330to the sorting channel 1348; and where one or more of the actuatorelements (e.g., element 1387, analogously to FIG. 13 (b)) is turned OFFfollowing triggering by the detection algorithms, delivering a desiredportion 1331 of the sample core stream containing a desired particle1355 to the default sorting channel 1346. As yet another particularexample, combination of the actuator-pair structure described inreference to FIGS. 16 (a) and (b) and the multiple actuation statesdescribed in reference to FIGS. 18 (a)-(d) may be implemented in someembodiments with the default sorting channel in the topmost position, asshown in FIG. 18 (a); and it may be implemented in other embodimentswith the default sorting channel in the middle position (correspondingto channel 1842 in FIG. 18 (c)), with some of the sorting statesdesigned to divert portions of the sample core stream to channels on oneside of channel 1842 (e.g., channels 1841, 1846 in FIGS. 18 (a) and (b))and some of the sorting states designed to divert portions of the samplecore stream to channels on the other side of channel 1842 (e.g.,channels 1843, 1844 in FIGS. 18 (c) and (d)). The default sortingchannel, in other words, may be designed to be any of the availablesorting channels. Some embodiments of the invention employing aplurality of detectors and/or a plurality of sorting actuators may alsobe realized with the use of a Gaussian beam with traditional diffractionproperties. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to beregarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.

1-15. (canceled)
 16. A particle analyzer, comprising: a source of anon-Gaussian, substantially nondiffracting light beam; a flow pathconfigured to produce a core stream in a flow cell, wherein the flowcell is configured to expose a segment of the core stream to thenon-Gaussian, substantially nondiffracting light beam; and a detectorconfigured to detect a signal from the core stream, the signal resultingfrom an interaction of a particle in the core stream with thenon-Gaussian, substantially nondiffracting light beam.
 17. The particleanalyzer of claim 16, further comprising: a first sorting actuatorconnected with the flowcell and downstream of the segment of the corestream exposed to the non-Gaussian, substantially nondiffracting lightbeam; and a plurality of sorting channels in fluid connection with theflow path and downstream of the first sorting actuator, the firstsorting actuator comprising multiple actuation states, wherein eachactuation state is configured to direct at least one part of the corestream to at least one corresponding sorting channel of the plurality ofsorting channels.
 18. The particle analyzer of claim 17, furthercomprising a second sorting actuator connected with the flow cell andopposite the first sorting actuator, the second sorting actuatorconfigured to be operated in coordination with the first sortingactuator.
 19. The particle analyzer of claim 16, further comprising; afirst plurality of sorting actuators connected with the flow cell, thefirst plurality of sorting actuators being positioned downstream of thesegment of the core stream exposed to the non-Gaussian, substantiallynondiffracting light beam; and a plurality of sorting channels in fluidconnection with the flow path and downstream of the first plurality ofsorting actuators, the first plurality of sorting actuators havingmultiple actuation states, each actuation state configured to direct atleast one part of the core stream to a corresponding sorting channel ofthe plurality of sorting channels, wherein the detector comprises aplurality of detectors, wherein individual detectors of the plurality ofdetectors are configured to receive the signal from the particle in acorresponding portion of the core stream.
 20. The particle analyzer ofclaim 19, further comprising a second plurality of sorting actuators,the second plurality of sorting actuators being connected with the flowcell and being opposite the first plurality of sorting actuators, thesecond plurality of sorting actuators configured to be operated incoordination with the first plurality of sorting actuators.
 21. Theparticle analyzer of claim 19, wherein the plurality of detectors isconfigured in a linear array substantially aligned with a propagationdirection of the non-Gaussian, substantially nondiffracting light beam.22. The particle analyzer of claim 21, further comprising a secondplurality of sorting actuators, the second plurality of sortingactuators being connected with the flow cell and being opposite thefirst plurality of sorting actuators, the second plurality of sortingactuators configured to be operated in coordination with the firstplurality of sorting actuators.
 23. The particle analyzer of claim 19,wherein the plurality of sorting channels is configured in atwo-dimensional array, wherein at least one individual sorting actuatorof the first plurality of sorting actuators is selectable to operate inat least one of the multiple actuation states to direct at least onepart of the core stream to at least one corresponding sorting channel ofthe plurality of sorting channels.
 24. The particle analyzer of claim23, wherein the plurality of detectors is configured in a linear arraysubstantially aligned with a propagation direction of the non-Gaussian,substantially nondiffracting light beam.
 25. The particle analyzer ofclaim 24, further comprising a second plurality of sorting actuators,the second plurality of sorting actuators being connected with the flowcell and being opposite the first plurality of sorting actuators, thesecond plurality of sorting actuators configured to be operated incoordination with the first plurality of sorting actuators.
 26. A methodfor analyzing particles, comprising: creating a core stream using aparticle analyzer having a source of a non-Gaussian, substantiallynondiffracting light beam and a flow path configured to produce the corestream in a flowcell; exposing the core stream to the non-Gaussian,substantially nondiffracting light beam in the flowcell; introducing atleast one particle into the core stream; creating a signal resultingfrom the interaction of the non-Gaussian, substantially nondiffractinglight beam with the at least one particle in the core stream; anddetecting with a detector the signal resulting from the interaction ofthe non-Gaussian, substantially nondiffracting light beam with the atleast one particle.
 27. The method of claim 26, further comprising:directing at least one part of the core stream to at least onecorresponding sorting channel of a plurality of sorting channels,wherein the plurality of sorting channels is in fluid connection withthe flow path and downstream of a first sorting actuator; and sortingthe at least one particle using the first sorting actuator connectedwith the flowcell and downstream of the segment of the core streamexposed to the non-Gaussian, substantially nondiffracting light beam,wherein the first sorting actuator comprises multiple actuation states,wherein each actuation state is configured to direct the at least onepart of the core stream to the at least one corresponding sortingchannel of the plurality of sorting channels.
 28. The method of claim27, further comprising operating a second sorting actuator, connectedwith the flow cell and opposite the first sorting actuator, incoordination with the first sorting actuator.
 29. The method of claim26, wherein the detector comprises a plurality of detectors, such thatthe method further comprises: receiving the signal from the at least oneparticle in a corresponding portion of the core stream using individualdetectors of the plurality of detectors; sorting the at least oneparticle using a first plurality of sorting actuators connected with theflowcell and downstream of the segment of the core stream exposed to thenon-Gaussian, substantially nondiffracting light beam, wherein the firstplurality of sorting actuators comprises multiple actuation states; anddirecting, using each actuation state of the multiple actuation states,at least one part of the core stream to at least one correspondingsorting channel of a plurality of sorting channels, wherein theplurality of sorting channels is in fluid connection with the flow pathand downstream of the first plurality of sorting actuators.
 30. Themethod of claim 29, further comprising operating a second plurality ofsorting actuators, connected with the flow cell and opposite the firstplurality of sorting actuators, in coordination with the first pluralityof sorting actuators.
 31. The method of claim 29, wherein the pluralityof detectors is configured in a linear array substantially aligned witha propagation direction of the non-Gaussian, substantiallynondiffracting light beam.
 32. The method of claim 31, furthercomprising operating a second plurality of sorting actuators, connectedwith the flow cell and opposite the first plurality of sortingactuators, in coordination with the first plurality of sortingactuators.
 33. The method of claim 29, wherein the plurality of sortingchannels is configured in a two-dimensional array, such that the methodfurther comprises: selectably operating at least one individual sortingactuator of the first plurality of sorting actuators in at least one ofthe multiple actuation states to direct at least one part of the corestream to at least one corresponding sorting channel of the plurality ofsorting channels.
 34. The method of claim 33, wherein the plurality ofdetectors is configured in a linear array substantially aligned with apropagation direction of the non-Gaussian, substantially nondiffractinglight beam.
 35. The method of claim 34, further comprising operating asecond plurality of sorting actuators, connected with the flow cell andopposite the first plurality of sorting actuators, in coordination withthe first plurality of sorting actuators.